What Is Gender?

Sometimes when talking about transgenderism, the DSM-5 is mentioned, since it reclassified gender dysphoria.

Gender = The biological differences between men and women.

Gender begins at conception. 

During the course of a person’s life, things change… Their interests, sexual partners, activities, residence and professions change, but not their gender… That is unless the person has gender dysphoria, which is distress regarding how they feel about their gender. Even still, this does not change their gender.

Most people use the terms sex and gender interchangeably. Some say they are different.

Sometimes when talking about transgenderism, the DSM-5 is mentioned, since it reclassified gender dysphoria. But what’s often missing from the conversation? You’re not told that the reclassification occurred to remove stigma associated with the transgender disorder.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Next, check out an episode from Our PAC Politics about how transgender ideology is so pervasive that it impacts government forms Listen Here.

Hollywood

A common argument used, against the legislation, is that many women working on productions in Georgia have rights that will be severely restricted by this law.

Since Georgia passed the “heartbeat bill” Hollywood cast members have been very vocal about abortion. Even companies say they are going to stop or limit filming in Georgia. Four companies you might know have been very vocal about their support of abortion: NBCUniversal, WarnerMedia, Netflix and Disney.

A common argument used, against the legislation, is that many women working on productions in Georgia have rights that will be severely restricted by this law.

What about the rights of the fathers who don’t want their children murdered?

What about the rights of the child, to live?

What about the Georgians who value life?

Do these companies think all their employees hold the same political values/ideology?

The actress, Alyssa Milano, has been actively campaigning against pro life legislation. Other actors and producers are calling for boycotts on Georgia and other states for passing life promoting legislation.

In the words of Governor Kemp… “We value and protect innocent life – even though that makes C-list celebrities squawk.”

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Next, check out an episode from Our PAC Politics about a Senator who voted against life  Listen Here.

Tactics

ICE has started using new tactics to catch illegal aliens

ICE has started using new tactics to catch illegal aliens. One of the tactics is referred to as a “honeypot” trap . Another tactic is using fingerprints from drunk driving arrests to locate and catch illegal aliens. These tactics are becoming helpful in locating and catching illegal aliens evading and ignoring deportation orders. Despite these facts, some State Prosecutors have filed  lawsuits to block ICE from entering courtrooms to detain illegal aliens after criminal proceedings.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Next, check out an episode from Our PAC Politics about a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China and his denied application for  asylum Listen Here.

The Agenda: Attack

Democrats are using their House majority to push their impeachment agenda.

Democrats are using their House majority to push their impeachment agenda… Or at the very least, impeachment craze. There are Democrats who understand that pushing this impeachment craze will bolster the re-election bid of President Trump. President Trump declared his bid to run for re-election as soon as he was elected. The Russia investigation was an attack on his re-election campaign, it was never about his Administration.  Democrats are struggling with figuring out how to motivate people to vote for them.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

For More… Check out an episode from Our PAC Politics About Impeachment … It’s only 21 minutes long. 

The Trust Nevada Women Act

Nevada has the first majority-women legislature in US history and they are using said legislature to promote the murder future generations of women.

With all that’s going on across the country, related to abortion, Nevada is lifting abortion restrictions. The Trust Nevada Women Act is the topic of review for this blog post.

For the record, Nevada lawmakers passed this bill.

Is this good news?

  • It gets rid of requirements that doctors tell pregnant patients about the emotional implications of an abortion.
  • It removes criminal penalties for inducing abortion without the advice of a doctor.
  • It removes a requirement that doctors find out the marital status and age of patients before performing abortions.

Decide for yourself. Do those sound like wonderful things to be celebrated?

The bill was passed by the Nevada state Assembly with a 27-13 vote, it passed with a significant number of representatives of the people voting to make murdering children easier.

Is this good news?

What is reproductive freedom?

Is it the right to murder due to inconvenience or unfortunate circumstances?

For some… Yes.

Who do we have to blame for this legislation? Blame Senator Yvanna Cancela.

Live in Nevada? Are you more proud to be a Nevadan since women can murder their children easier than ever before?

Is this a consensus of what Nevadans want?

Be advised Illinois, Kansas, Maine, and Rhode Island are all considering similar legislation. Despite bills like this making it harder to identify and help survivors of abuse and trafficking, they want more legislation like this across the country. Spend some time reading up on the states that are making moves towards making murdering children and infanticide easier. If you are informed and inform those around you, bills like this, Senators like Yvanna Cancela, don’t stand a chance.

It’s a shame that Nevada has the first majority-women legislature in US history and they are using said legislature to promote the murder future generations of women. So much for wanting everyone to participate in the American dream.

 

For More… Check out an episode from Our PAC Politics About Abortion In Nevada … It’s only 11 minutes long. 

California Is Indoctrinating Kindergartners

The curriculum we’re talking about presents transgender ideology and same-sex relationships as positive.

Recently, California decided that the education for kindergartners in public schools should include information on gender identity. California teachers are going to be explaining gender fluidity to children. The sexually explicit and dangerous agenda of a minority is being imposed on the majority.

Page 45 of the K-3 guidelines states:

“While students may not fully understand the concepts of gender expression and identity, some children in kindergarten and even younger have identified as transgender or understand they have a gender identity that is different from their sex assigned at birth.”

This has been approved by the California Board of Education.

The curriculum we’re talking about presents transgender ideology and same-sex relationships as positive. The curriculum suggests that children choose this lifestyle. Kindergartners.

Page 46 of the guidelines states:

“Members of the community who defy traditional stereotypes (e.g., women firefighters, male nurses, and stay-at-home fathers/guardians/caretakers) could be invited as guest speakers to share about their jobs and to serve as role models and myth busters. Be sure to include individuals of all genders, including people who are transgender.”

One of the books removed from the recommended reading list was “S.E.X.: The All-You-Need-to-Know Sexuality Guide to Get You Through Your Teens and Twenties,” which describes anal sex and bondage. Luckily California had sense enough NOT to give this book to 5 year old children, at least for now. A book that was kept on the recommended reading list is “My Princess Boy.”  

If you’re in California and wondering,  parents can’t remove their children from this indoctrination. Parental rights are being stripped. California is resisting common sense.

 

Betrayal

79% of voters believe that illegal immigration is bad for America.

Up to  46% of voters nationwide supported President Donald Trump when he proposed sending illegal immigrants straight to sanctuary cities. As a country, we can’t handle more than 100,000 people per month coming into the United States in manners inconsistent with our laws and regulations.

But when we have politicians and places that advocate for letting these people come into the United States in manners inconsistent with our laws and regulations, does it not make sense to assume it would be okay, let alone welcomed to send these people there?

Almost half of all Republican voters consider illegal immigration a national security threat for America. Many Democratic politicians consider illegal immigration to be a non-issue, let alone a security issue.

Why are Democratic politicians in heavily Democratic cities opposed to taking in the poor, down on their luck migrants they rant and rave about in the streets?

How can Democrats argue that illegal immigrants strengthen our sovereignty as a nation?

Politicians who oppose getting control of the people who enter this country in a manner different than the way in which the laws/regulations prescribe, must contend with one fact: 79% of voters believe that illegal immigration is bad for America.

You can be pro-immigration while requiring that people follow the rules. In what other example does this same logic apply?

Some people may not believe that passing a test should be required to obtain a drivers license. Maybe they should deem those who want to uphold the requirement of passing a drivers test anti-driver.

Some people may not believe that passing an exam should be required to become a doctor. Maybe they should deem those who want to uphold the requirement of passing an exam anti-doctor, anti-healthcare.

Let’s go back to the quote above, 79% of voters believe that illegal immigration is bad for America. Question. Does this quote mean that 79% of voters don’t want ANY immigrants?

No.

Here is another fact to be considered: 29% of voters think granting legal status to those illegal immigrants already here is more important than dealing with illegal immigration.

There are more voters that believe illegal immigration is bad, than there are voters that believe that we need to immediately grant legal status to the illegal immigrants already here. So when politicians say we need to “deal with the illegal immigrants here before we can deal with the illegal immigrants on their way or at the border” be advised that they are not representing the will of the American people.

If you are one of the people that have been mislabeled for simply asking questions, know this… It is okay to ask questions, and you should.

When you get on an airplane, they ask… Who are you?

When you apply for a job, they ask… Who are you?

When you go to the welfare office for welfare benefits, they ask… Who are you?

When you start school, they ask… Who are you?

When you start a business, the Secretary of State and IRS ask… Who are you?

In this country, when you travel, you are asked for identification. Why can we not ask for identification from the people traveling here?

In this country, when you try to positively impact the economic status of your family, you are asked for identification. Why can we not as for identification from those coming to this country seeking to positively impact the economic status of their families?

In this country, when you are down on your luck and need help from the government, you are asked for identification. Why can we not ask for identification from those seeking help from our government?

In this country, when you make a decision to increase your earning potential, by means of an education, you are asked for identification. Why can we not ask for identification from those who have made a decision to increase their earning potential, by means of an education?

In this country, when you start a business, the Secretary of State, in your local state, and IRS ask for identification of the individuals behind the organization. Why can we not ask for identification from those who wish to release their entrepreneurial genius here in the United States of American?

Who are you?

This is a fundamental question of American society.

Some people say that President Trump could not have been serious in making the suggestion to send illegal immigrants to sanctuary cities. We think he was, and is, serious, but for the benefit of this post, we’ll give the other side the benefit of the doubt and assume they are right. Let’s assume the President wasn’t serious about sending illegal immigrants to sanctuary cities. Should this assumption detract from our nations need for a serious debate about the best way to address the problem of illegal immigration?

Here’s one last fact to consider: Politicians in sanctuary cities, they can’t have it both ways, they can’t demand the nation take in illegal immigrants while closing their city and state borders to illegal immigrants. Do you want them here or do you want them to leave, make up your mind.

 

Next…

Listen to our podcast… Our PAC Politics (Mon-Fri – 5am & 7pm PST)

Utah Will Not Follow New York

The Utah Vital Statistics Act H.B. 153 will stop people in Utah from changing the gender on their birth certificates, and we support this legislation, unlike Introduction 954-A, signed into law on October 2018, by New York City mayor Bill de Blasio, which includes a third sex designation on birth certificates. Those in New York City who identify as neither male or female, the only two genders we’ve ever known, are now able to change the gender on their birth certificate to ‘X’, as of January 1, 2019.

What about the 52 year old man who identifies as a 6 year old girl? See Him Here

Is his reality not equally deserving of recognition by society?

What about those that are trans-species and identify as say, a cat? See A Trans-Species Here

In New York, how are they determining who and whats reality they are going to officially recognize? Does Mayor Bill de Blasio also advocate for the trans-species in his state? In New York, Mayor Bill de Blasio pushed to have the requirement to provide supporting documentation from a medical professional, to change your gender, removed. You don’t even need a qualified professional to assist you in New York.

Walking down the streets of New York and feeling like a cat? Think it, speak it and so shall it be. Thank you Mayor Bill de Blasio. We also can’t forget to thank Council Speaker Corey Johnson.

In Utah, the people’s representatives at least stand up for all people, including babies. While in New York, Mayor Bill de Blasio is okay with babies being referred to as ‘X’, as if they aren’t human, in Utah, Representative Merrill Nelson and Senator Ralph Okerlund want babies to be assigned a gender at birth, because they are, after all, people.

View The Utah Legislation

As an organization, like the state of Utah, we don’t condone harassment or harm to anyone, especially when they are dealing with a mental health issue. Like Utah, yet again, unlike New York, we want to promote legislation and legislators that promote scientifically based… REALITY. We are not opposed to, nor would we support legislation that prohibits individuals from living their lives in a manner that reflects their gender identity, but this changing birth certificates stuff is funny business, and we can’t ignore it, and neither should you.

Where does it stop?

Give them an inch, they demand foot, then they take a mile. 

Before you know it…

In New York, they don’t even require proof that transsexuals and transgenders are undergoing hormone treatment or getting sex-change surgery if they want to change the gender on their birth certificate.

Literally, the process is as follows:

  1. Think it.
  2. Feel it.
  3. Say it.
  4. Scream it.
  5. Force it.

Whala…. You’ve just changed genders. Now you just need the paperwork. They’ll probably be getting rid of that next. At least the entire process will be eco-friendly.

The English Language Unity Act of 2017

Did you know that 81% of Americans believe that English should be our official language of the United States?

We’re aware of the fact that it’s 2019. 

We’ve just welcomed a new Congress but the battle for official legislation, making English our official language, is still on the legislative table. Our organization is keeping tabs on H.R.997, which establishes English as the official language of the United States. This Resolution also establishes a uniform language requirement for those undergoing  our citizen naturalization process.

Despite the fact that Democrats took control of the U.S. House of Representatives, we are confident in the success of this Resolution due to a recent Rasmussen Reports poll, sponsored by ProEnglish. The poll reported that 81% of Americans believe that English should be our official language of the United States.

The bill also stipulates that any person injured by a violation of the bill may obtain relief, including a declaratory judgment, in a civil action.

If you would like to view the bill yourself: Click Here

To reference the Senate version of this bill search for S. 678.




Continue reading “The English Language Unity Act of 2017”

Rejecting Sanctuary State Status

Is wanting your state to be safe, by means complying with Federal Immigration Law, hatred?

Does it seem like only one side is being heard on this issue?

How much influence should non-citizens have over American Immigration Policy?

When politicians fight to ensure their non-citizen constituents will be admitted to the U.S. and allowed to remain here, are they working directly against the best interest of the American people?

Donald Trump, by no means, is the perfect President. We can’t even say, as an organization, if we would have supported him during the election. But what we can say now, is that since his election, we have seen a new willingness, on the part of various government agencies, to listen to the other side, our side, on this issue. Is it because of Donald Trump? We can’t say with certainty. But what we can say, is that government agencies are now listening to both sides, those wanting sanctuary state status, and those in opposition to sanctuary status. We may not be in a perfect place, be we are in a good place, compared to where we were.

For those that reject sanctuary state status, know this. While we may not be in a position to see exactly what we want, a United States of America free of any sanctuary states, we are at least now living in a United States where we are being listened to. Does this mean that some people aren’t calling us racist for wanting a safe and secure America? No, this still happens. This does mean however, that if you use your voice, and speak up about the issue, you will be heard.

If enough of us ban together, together, we can get the message across that sanctuary states are wrong, and they must go. If you’re on Facebook or Twitter, stand with us in opposition to sanctuary states.